A recent case from Alberta supports
this. A teenaged girl hosted a party at the family home. One
of the guests became intoxicated, but left in a vehicle driven
by a sober person. The intoxicated guest persuaded the sober
one to drop him off at his car, which was parked several blocks
away. While driving his own car the intoxicated guest hit
a pedestrian. The court found that the teenaged girl’s
father was not liable to the pedestrian, not because a social
host does not have a legal obligation, but because the father
could not have done anything differently to prevent the accident.
Indeed, the court suggested that the law now imposes a duty
upon a social host to take reasonable steps to prevent injury
to third parties by inebriated guests, and that the duty does
not depend on who provides the alcohol.
The court’s suggestion is consistent with the developing
duty to take affirmative action. The question is whether the
relationship between the parties is such that it is reasonably
foreseeable that carelessness by the defendant would cause
injury to the plaintiff. What amounts to carelessness will
depend on all the circumstances of a particular case, but
it could include failing to take positive steps to prevent
the accident.
The courts in the United States have already found social
hosts liable for injuries to third persons. It is only a matter
of time until the right fact situation brings this developing
social host liability to Canada.
So, if you know or should know that a guest is intoxicated,
and might drive, you should try to prevent her or him from
doing so. Failing to take appropriate action may mean you
will be held liable for injuries your guest may suffer, or
may inflict on others.
< back to resources
|